PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Studies in Linguistics0 citations

An Exploratory Analysis of Rhetorical Device Use in Korean University Students’ English Presentation Scripts

View Full Paper
EKEunjeo Kim

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the use of rhetorical devices in English presentation scripts of Korean university students.
  • Analyzed ten presentation scripts from Korean university students
  • Identified rhetorical device usage across different sections: introduction, body, conclusion
  • Examined individual variation in rhetorical strategy
  • Used quantitative analysis to assess lexical complexity using Type–Token Ratio
  • Aporia, rhetorical questions, and anaphora were the most used devices
  • Section-sensitive distribution patterns were identified across scripts
  • Notable individual variation in rhetorical repertoires was observed
  • Moderate positive association between rhetorical diversity and lexical complexity was found

Abstract

This exploratory, small-scale study examines the use of rhetorical devices in Korean university students’ English presentation scripts. Ten scripts collected during the fall semester of 2025 were analyzed to identify distributional patterns across discourse sections (introduction, body, conclusion), individual variation in strategic diversity, and associations between rhetorical diversity and lexical complexity (Type–Token Ratio). Quantitative analyses showed that aporia, rhetorical questions, and anaphora were the most frequently used devices, with section-sensitive distributional tendencies across scripts. Learners also differed substantially in the breadth of their rhetorical repertoires, indicating notable individual variation in strategy deployment. A moderate positive association was observed between rhetorical device diversity and lexical complexity. Taken together, these findings suggest the pedagogical value of explicit rhetorical instruction in EFL presentation contexts while underscoring the exploratory scope and limited generalizability of the present dataset.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Eunjeo Kim (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994bdd873532290d01fdb2https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..78.202601.303
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Study on International Students’ Perceptions and Use of Writing strategies for Academic Report2024
  2. 2A comparative study of Korean and Chinese learners’ strategy use in request-refusal continuous dialogue speech acts2026
  3. 3Comparative Analysis Of Grammatical Emphasis And Rhetorical Emphasis In English Language2024
  4. 4Teachers’ Views of L1 Use in English Speaking Classes : A Case Study of University Teachers in Korea2024
  5. 5An Analysis of Grammatical Error Types in European, Chinese, and Korean L2 Learners’ Writings2024