Curriculum integrates community insight into trauma-informed care for medical students, highlighting its importance.
Introduction Trauma affects 90% of individuals and has profound impacts on health, making it essential for medical trainees to recognize its effects. Trauma-informed care (TIC) offers a framework for developing these skills. Despite its importance, no TIC curriculum integrates community feedback into its design. To address this gap, we developed a 4-hour TIC curriculum that incorporates community insight, clinical expertise, and practical communication training. Methods The curriculum design followed community-based participatory research principles, engaging community members as contributors. The training included a dynamic combination of didactic lectures, video demonstrations, small-group role-play, and an OSCE, supported by a novel TIC toolkit. Community partners were trained as standardized patients (SPs). We assessed student outcomes through pre- and postsession surveys, employing 5-point Likert scales and open-ended responses. Additionally, a custom assessment tool was developed to evaluate OSCE performance, with SPs providing structured feedback. Results Thirty-four third-year medical students participated, with 100% survey completion. Quantitative analysis revealed significant increases in students’ understanding of TIC principles and confidence in applying them from pre- to postsession (p < .05 for all metrics). Students demonstrated strong performance on the OSCE, achieving a mean OSCE performance score of 31.4/38 (or overall score of 82.6%). SP feedback highlighted the students’ ability to engage empathetically and effectively in trauma-sensitive encounters. Discussion This novel TIC curriculum on women's health demonstrates a successful, scalable model for integrating TIC training into medical education. By embedding community voices and combining evidence-based principles with experiential learning, this program addresses educational gaps in TIC medical education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nunziato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: