• Dynamic 11 C-PE2I SSM/PCA using R 1 and SBR for differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. • Single-reference SSM/PCA can be unstable in clinical datasets with uncertain labels. • Ensemble-SSM/PCA improves robustness through repeated reference sampling. • High balanced accuracy achieved on an independent hold-out test set. Scaled Subprofile Modelling using principal component analysis (SSM/PCA) is a multivariate analysis technique primarily used in 18 F-FDG PET brain studies to produce disease-specific patterns (DPs) and scalar scores aiding neurological diagnosis. SSM/PCA relies on well-characterized reference groups, posing challenges in real-world clinical datasets where diagnoses may be uncertain. A data-driven ensemble approach may offer a more robust alternative to random sampling when reference groups are unavailable. To apply SSM/PCA to dynamic 11 C-PE2I-PET data for differential diagnosis of parkinsonism using a Monte Carlo cross-validation-inspired framework with ensemble prediction. Dopamine transporter availability, expressed as the specific binding ratio (SBR) relative to cerebellar gray matter and relative cerebral blood flow (R 1 ) images from 47 healthy controls and 316 patients who underwent dynamic 11 C-PE2I-PET on a Discovery MI PET/CT scanner were included. Patients had a single most probable diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) based on clinical information and the PET reading. A stratified 80/20 training/testing split was applied, repeated across 100 seeds, to generate DPs used for training ensemble classification models. Classification accuracy was assessed on the test-set. Combining SBR and R 1 improved accuracy yielding a balanced accuracy of 90%, with SBR primarily differentiating patients from healthy controls and R 1 for differentiating between PD, DLB and PSP. Our results highlight the potential of an ensemble-based SSM/PCA method to assist differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. Future work will focus on including additional atypical parkinsonian disorders.
Falk et al. (Sun,) studied this question.