PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026European Journal of Preventive Cardiology4 citationsOpen Access

Effect of exercise modality and intensity on endothelial function in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

View Full Paper
LFLaura Fuertes-KenneallySBSabina BaladzhaevaAMAgustín Manresa‐Rocamora

Key Result

High-intensity interval aerobic exercise improved endothelial function by 3.47% (95% CI: 2.02–4.92) versus usual care and was superior to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effects of various exercise modalities and intensities on endothelial function in patients with cardiovascular disease.
  • Conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of trials related to cardiovascular disease.
  • Included randomized and non-randomized trials involving adult patients.
  • Classified exercise interventions into different modalities and intensities, including aerobic, resistance, and combined exercises.
  • Measured endothelial function using flow-mediated dilation.
  • Thirty-seven studies with 6818 participants were analyzed.
  • High-intensity interval aerobic exercise (HIIE) significantly improved endothelial function compared to usual care and moderate-intensity exercise.
  • High-intensity combined exercise (HCE) and moderate-intensity combined exercise (MCE) also showed improvement, but the effects were less robust than HIIE.
  • Sensitivity analyses confirmed HIIE as the most effective intervention.

Structured PICO

Does exercise modality and intensity (specifically high-intensity interval aerobic exercise) improve endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation in adults with coronary artery disease or chronic heart failure compared to usual care?

P
Population
6,818 adults with coronary artery disease or chronic heart failure across 37 studies (80 groups).
I
Intervention
Exercise training of various modalities and intensities, including moderate-intensity aerobic (MAE), high-intensity interval aerobic (HIIE), moderate-intensity resistance (MRE), high-intensity resistance (HRE), moderate-intensity combined (MCE), and high-intensity combined (HCE).
C
Comparator
Usual care (UC) or other exercise modalities/intensities.
O
Outcome
Endothelial function measured by brachial flow-mediated dilation (FMD).surrogate

High-intensity interval aerobic exercise is the most robust and evidence-based exercise modality for improving endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease or heart failure.

Limitations

  • High-intensity combined exercise (HCE) results relied on a single group
  • Need for more randomized trials to confirm HCE efficacy

Abstract

Abstract Aims Endothelial dysfunction is a hallmark of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Exercise effectively improves endothelial function, yet the impact of different modalities and intensities remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of aerobic (AE), resistance (RE), and combined exercise (CE), on endothelial function measured by flow-mediated dilation (FMD). Methods A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised trials in adults with coronary artery disease or chronic heart failure was conducted. Electronic databases were searched up to April 2025. Interventions were classified as usual care (UC), moderate-intensity AE (MAE), high-intensity interval AE (HIIE), moderate-intensity RE (MRE), high-intensity RE (HRE), moderate-intensity CE (MCE), and high-intensity CE (HCE). Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effect size index, and interventions ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results Thirty-seven studies (80 groups; n = 6818) were included. Compared with UC, MAE (2.04%; 95% CI: 1.01–3.07), HIIE (3.47%; 95% CI: 2.02–4.92), MCE (2.71%; 95% CI: 0.05–5.36), and HCE (8.25%; 95% CI: 3.18–13.32) significantly improved brachial FMD, whereas MRE did not. HIIE outperformed MAE (1.43%; 95% CI: 0.09–2.78). Although HCE showed the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA: 98.2%), this relied on a single group. Crucially, sensitivity analyses confirmed HIIE as the most robust high-performing intervention (84.0%) compared to MRE (61.6%) and MCE (61.3%). Conclusion Exercise significantly enhances endothelial function in in patients with CVD. HIIE emerged as the most robust and evidence-based modality, demonstrating superior efficacy over moderate continuous exercise. While high-intensity combined protocols (HCE) show significant theoretical potential, randomised trials are urgently needed to confirm their efficacy. Current evidence supports HIIE as a primary strategy for vascular adaptation in cardiac rehabilitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fuertes-Kenneally et al. (2026) studied this question. High-intensity interval aerobic exercise improved endothelial function by 3.47% (95% CI: 2.02–4.92) versus usual care and was superior to moderate-intensity aerobic exercise.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994bdd873532290d01ff4ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag118
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper