PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026East European Politics and Societies and Cultures0 citations

Between Control and Invisibility: Platform Workers and the Limits of Protection in Poland and Slovakia

View Full Paper
DPDominika PolkowskaMKMartin KahanecASAnna Sadowska

Key Points

  • The study investigates the effects of the EU Platform Work Directive on workers' rights in Poland and Slovakia.
  • Conducted seventeen in-depth interviews with trade unions, government officials, platform representatives, and labor experts.
  • Analyzed stakeholder perspectives on the EU Directive's influence on platform work conditions.
  • Examined concerns regarding enforcement and clarity of the Directive's regulations.
  • Stakeholders expressed ambivalence about the Directive's effectiveness in improving workers' conditions.
  • Concerns were noted about weak enforcement, potential undermining of worker flexibility, and administrative capacity.
  • The study highlighted how the lack of strong labor institutions limits the transformative potential of EU regulations.

Abstract

Platform work has become a growing, yet largely invisible, component of labor markets in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), offering income opportunities but also reinforcing precarity, informality, and exclusion especially for migrant and low-income workers. This article examines how national stakeholders in Poland and Slovakia respond to the Platform Work Directive of the European Union (EU), which aims at improving working conditions in the digital labor economy. Based on seventeen in-depth interviews with trade unions, government officials, platform representatives, and labor experts, the study uncovers deep ambivalence about the Directive’s potential to bring meaningful change in the working conditions of platform workers. While many see it as a long-overdue step toward formalizing rights and addressing bogus self-employment, others warn of merely formal transposition with weak enforcement and limited impact. Stakeholders highlight serious concerns about administrative capacity, lack of legal clarity, and the risk of undermining the flexibility that many workers, especially migrants, rely on. The findings point to a broader issue: in the absence of robust, pluralist interest representation and strong domestic labor institutions, national actors often receive EU regulation passively, treating it as an external obligation rather than a transformative opportunity. The Directive may elevate platform work on the policy agenda, yet it is unlikely, on its own, to alter the deeper structural inequalities and power asymmetries shaping platform work in CEE countries. The article argues for a more socially grounded approach to policy implementation, one that centers the lived realities and voices of workers at the margins.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Polkowska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c01873532290d0202fahttps://doi.org/10.1177/08883254261423512
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Study of Working Conditions in Platform Work2025 · 5 citations
  2. 2Platform work and traditional employee protection: The need for alternative legal approaches2024 · 11 citations
  3. 3Institutional Exclusion in Platform Work: Assessing the EU Platform Work Directive in Malaysia and Thailand2026
  4. 4Implementation of Platform Directive 2024/2831 into the Polish legal order – areas relevant to the entire labour law2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Informal Coping Strategies Among Platform Workers: Institutional Voids and Worker Agency in Bulgaria2026