PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026BMC Psychiatry2 citationsOpen Access

Transcranial alternating current stimulation for chronic insomnia: a meta-analytic evaluation of sleep restoration and safety in adults

YNYehia NabilNHNourhan HatemMAMenna M. Aboelkhier

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) for treating chronic insomnia in adults.
  • Systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane up to July 2025.
  • Inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on tACS for chronic insomnia.
  • Primary outcomes included sleep metrics from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and sleep onset latency.
  • Data pooling was conducted using random-effects models and risk of bias assessed via Cochrane RoB 2.0.
  • tACS significantly reduced sleep onset latency at 2 weeks (MD = -56.90 min) and 4 weeks (MD = -52.20 min).
  • Improved Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores (MD = -5.73; p < 0.0001).
  • Increased total sleep time (MD = +85.29 min; p = 0.0013).
  • Reduced daytime disturbances (MD = -0.94; p < 0.0001).
  • Response rates favored tACS with a relative risk of 11.21 (p = 0.0002).

Abstract

Chronic insomnia affects approximately one-third of adults globally, imposing substantial health burdens with limited effective treatments. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) emerges as a non-invasive neuromodulatory approach, though its efficacy and safety profile require systematic evaluation. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through July 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating tACS in adults with chronic insomnia. Primary outcomes included Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores, sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), and subjective sleep efficiency. Secondary outcomes encompassed remission/response rates, daytime disturbances, mood symptoms, and adverse events. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed via Cochrane RoB 2.0 and GRADE. Four RCTs (n = 247) were included. tACS significantly reduced SOL at 2 weeks (MD = −56.90 min; 95% CI: −74.44 to −39.36) and 4 weeks (MD = −52.20 min; −67.03 to −37.37), improved PSQI (MD = −5.73; −8.35 to −3.10; p < 0.0001), increased TST (MD = +85.29 min; 33.42 to 137.15; p = 0.0013), and reduced daytime disturbances (MD = −0.94; −1.13 to −0.76; p < 0.0001). Response rates favored tACS (RR = 11.21; 3.20–39.23; p = 0.0002). Mood improvements were not sustained beyond 8 weeks. No significant adverse events emerged versus sham (RR = 1.06; 0.16–6.95). Heterogeneity ranged moderate-to-high (I2 = 46.9–97.2%). tACS demonstrates rapid efficacy (2–6 weeks) and safety for core insomnia symptoms. Sustained benefits require protocol optimization and long-term evaluation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nabil et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c14873532290d0203ffhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-07900-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper