Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative comparative analysis reveals how problem-solving skills impact performance in firms, suggesting better lean practices lead to success.
Purpose This study aims to determine whether firms that focus on the technical side of lean, without building a foundation of problem-solving skills among workers, generate worse or better economic performance (return on assets) than firms that adopt a more balanced approach. Design/methodology/approach Following a configurational approach, the authors use a qualitative comparative analysis method to identify lean− systematic problem-solving (SPS) interactions associated with superior economic performance. Data were collected on a sample of 13 Italian small and medium-sized firms (involving 26 managers and 112 shop-floor workers). Coherently with the underlying principles of the Shingo model, this study offers insights into how firms can optimize lean transformations to achieve superior economic performance through congruent lean−SPS configurations. Findings Results show that organizations can achieve superior financial performance only if the selected lean practices are supported by workers who adopt a systematic approach to solve problems. Originality/value This research contributes to the operations literature by providing a better understanding of some critical factors that influence the success or failure of lean implementation. The focus on complex configurations enabled us to identify different lean−SPS interactions associated with superior (or low) economic performance, and the authors empirically demonstrate that SPS behavior is indeed the basis for successful lean transformations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Furlan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: