This evaluation demonstrates the impact of MIMO techniques on link performance in LoRa networks, suggesting improvements for wireless sensor deployments.
Low-Power Wide-Area Network (LPWAN) technologies play a central role in large-scale wireless sensor network (WSN) deployments, where energy efficiency, coverage and reliability dominate over throughput. Among them, Long Range (LoRa) technology has emerged as a widely adopted physical-layer solution due to its ability to operate at extremely low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). While multi-antenna techniques can potentially enhance link performance, their applicability in LoRa-type systems is constrained by low-SNR operation, strict energy budgets and the quality of channel state information (CSI). This paper presents a systematic and progressively structured evaluation of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) techniques in LoRa-type systems under representative operating conditions. A multi-stage simulation framework, implemented using the Vienna SLS v2.0 (Q3) simulator and adapted to LoRa-like waveforms, is employed to isolate the impact of large-scale propagation, small-scale fading, antenna configuration and CSI quality. The analysis starts from a system-level coverage baseline and advances to link-level evaluations of diversity-oriented MIMO schemes and spatial multiplexing configurations under both ideal and imperfect CSI. The results demonstrate that spatial diversity techniques are well aligned with the operational characteristics of LoRa links, offering robust performance in low-SNR regimes and under limited CSI accuracy. In contrast, spatial multiplexing exhibits higher sensitivity to channel estimation errors, with its practical benefits becoming apparent primarily when evaluated using throughput-oriented metrics such as packet error rate and normalized goodput. Overall, the study highlights the fundamental trade-off between reliability and capacity in LoRa MIMO systems and provides design-oriented insights for wireless sensor network deployments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mouziouras et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: