Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short-term longitudinal study investigates grammatical growth in bilingual and DLD children, suggesting implications for diagnosis.
We investigate grammatical learning in Italian through a multipoint assessment over a short period (3 months), aiming to evaluate the potential of a longitudinal measure to differentiate between typical bilingual development and Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). Seventy-five children aged 4-6 years were tested and assigned to three groups: monolingual typically developing (TD), bilingual TD, and monolingual DLD. Participants completed standardised measures of language development at screening (nonword repetition, NWR; and sentence comprehension, BVL_Comp) and a forced-choice grammatical task measuring accuracy on agreement structures at Time 1 (T1) and 3 months apart at Time 2 (T2). No overall significant between-group differences were found in longitudinal change. However, within-group analyses revealed important diagnostic patterns. For bilingual TD - but not for children with DLD - longitudinal improvement in grammatical accuracy correlated positively with NWR scores obtained at screening, confirming NWR's predictive value for short-term grammatical growth. Within the DLD group, a significant divergence emerged between subtypes: children with Expressive DLD showed greater improvement than those with Receptive/Expressive DLD, who continued to exhibit persistent morphological difficulties. Theoretically, our findings confirm group- differences in the acquisition of agreement structures (Subject - Verb > Clitic - Past Participle) and demonstrate that children's sensitivity to agreement morphology serves as a reliable proxy for overall grammatical development given the positive correlation with standardised BVL_Comp scores. Although longitudinal changes in grammatical accuracy over 3 months were modest, subgroup patterns highlight the diagnostic potential of fine-grained, short-term longitudinal measures in distinguishing between profiles of language impairment and bilingual development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: