Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative exploration uncovers eco-anxiety experiences in individuals attending ecopsychology interventions, suggesting pathways for resilience.
A contextual perspective on mental health is critical in developing a comprehensive understanding of wellbeing in line with the precepts of Geopsychiatry. A review of the literature indicates a limited understanding of how people deal with the global climate crisis using a geo-psychiatry perspective. The experience of awakening to the climate crisis has been described using the term “eco-anxiety”. A lack of in-depth exploration of this subjective experience has meant a fragmented theory. To contribute to our understanding of eco-anxiety, the current study explores qualitative aspects of this experience, looking at the reports of eco-anxiety experienced by people who self-reported attending a group psycho-ecological intervention for facing the climate crisis. Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, critical realist ontology and moderate social constructionist epistemology, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 adults who self-identified as experiencing “eco-anxiety” and had attended an ecopsychology support group. Two core categories of theory emerged: “the psychosocial processes of eco-anxiety” and “the psychosocial processes of regeneratively sustained eco-anxiety”. The results are explored through figures that analogise the seasons, demonstrating the participants' reported process of psychosocial adaptation: the growth and expansion of the self in the face of eco-anxiety, reflecting the integration of experiences. This metaphor does not suggest a linear process. Participants described moving bidirectionally. Despite the challenges, group participants report that the process of awareness can lead to a more connected way of life and ultimately the development of psychosocial resilience, which is essential for navigating sustained mutual care in the face of global environmental instability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aston et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: