This qualitative analysis examines how women domestic workers manage caste oppression, suggesting complex relational tactics.
While prior research has explored how marginalized caste workers cope with caste-based indignities, less is known about the interactive processes through which caste is relationally negotiated at work. Addressing this gap, I investigate how women domestic workers engage in relational work to navigate caste-based oppression and the outcomes such efforts produce. Drawing on 37 in-depth interviews in Lucknow, India, my analysis identifies three relational work tactics — establishing trustworthiness , performing deferential appeasement , and eliciting empathy , that enable workers to manage caste-inflected workplace dynamics. These tactics, however, yield ambivalent outcomes of conditional acceptance , revocable concessions , and transient compassion . To conceptualize the simultaneous negotiation and reproduction of caste structures, I advance the concept of relational ambivalence , which demonstrates the agency of marginalized workers operating within entrenched social hierarchies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aiman Nida (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: