PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology2 citations

Clinical impact of carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy: lack of benefit and surgical delay in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

View Full Paper
MKM. KatoTMTaisuke MatsueSYShoma Yamamoto

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to assess the efficacy of carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (GCarb) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
  • Retrospective review of 265 patients undergoing radical cystectomy
  • Comparison of different chemotherapy regimens: optimal NAC, suboptimal regimens, and surgery alone
  • Propensity score matching used to compare GCarb and no-NAC cohorts
  • No difference in pathological complete response rates between GCarb and no-NAC cohorts
  • Disease-free survival was worse in the GCarb cohort (P = .07)
  • Longer median time-to-cystectomy for GCarb group (3.1 months) compared to no-NAC (1.5 months)

Abstract

Abstract Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improves outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), whereas the efficacy of carboplatin-based or suboptimal regimens remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 265 patients who underwent radical cystectomy, including 164 with MIBC. Among them, 21 received ≥3 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin (optimal NAC), 44 received ≤2 cycles of cisplatin-based NAC, 36 received gemcitabine/carboplatin (GCarb) NAC, and 63 underwent cystectomy alone. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the GCarb and no-NAC cohorts based on clinical stage, performance status, and renal function. The pathological complete response rate did not differ between the groups. Disease-free survival tended to be worse in the GCarb cohort (P = .07). Importantly, the median time-to-cystectomy from diagnosis with MIBC was significantly longer with GCarb than no-NAC cohort (3.1 vs. 1.5 months). These findings suggest that GCarb-based NAC may be detrimental by delaying surgery without providing oncological benefit, reinforcing guideline recommendations against its use in MIBC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kato et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994c91873532290d0212e2https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyag027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper