Formal model shows open exit rights reduce war incentives in democracies and hybrid regimes, suggesting effective conflict prevention mechanisms.
This paper presents a formal game-theoretic model in which states are prohibited from blocking citizen emigration during wartime, and members of a free movement alliance grant each other unconditional exit and entry rights. Philosophically, the model formalizes and extends Immanuel Kant (1795) Third Definitive Article of Perpetual Peace from a peacetime principle to a wartime deterrence institution. We derive Nash equilibria for war and peace, showing that open exit rights during wartime reduce war incentives by endogenizing population loss (brain drain) as a cost of aggression. The model identifies a selectorate boundary condition, suggesting the mechanism is most effective for democracies and hybrid regimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lukas Geiger (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: