Novel approach demonstrates explainable AI effectiveness in interpreting hidden neuron activations, enhancing model trust.
With the widespread adoption of deep learning techniques, the need for explainability and trustworthiness is increasingly critical, especially in safety-sensitive applications and for improved debugging, given the black-box nature of these models. The explainable AI (XAI) literature offers various helpful techniques; however, many approaches use a secondary deep learning-based model to explain the primary model’s decisions or require domain expertise to interpret the explanations. A relatively new approach involves explaining models using high-level, human-understandable concepts. While these methods have proven effective, an intriguing area of exploration lies in using a white-box technique to explain the probing model. We present a novel, model-agnostic, post hoc XAI method that provides meaningful interpretations for hidden neuron activations. Our approach leverages a Wikipedia-derived concept hierarchy, encompassing approximately 2 million classes as background knowledge, and uses deductive reasoning-based concept induction to generate explanations. Our method demonstrates competitive performance across various evaluation metrics, including statistical evaluation, concept activation analysis, and benchmarking against contemporary methods. Additionally, a specialized study with large language models (LLMs) highlights how LLMs can serve as explainers in a manner similar to our method, showing comparable performance with some trade-offs. Furthermore, we have developed a tool called ConceptLens, enabling users to test custom images and obtain explanations for model decisions. Finally, we introduce an entirely reproducible, end-to-end system that simplifies the process of replicating our system and results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dalal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: