Two-phase study investigates how mirror-gazing induced dissociation affects agency in undergraduates, suggesting a causal link.
Dissociation and sense of agency disruptions are related, but the causal pattern between them is unknown. This two-phase study explored whether laboratory-induced dissociative experiences impair the sense of agency. Study 1 tested the feasibility of generating dissociation and investigated its effect on explicit (self-reported) agency. N = 98 undergraduate students underwent one of two mirror-gazing manipulation conditions (with or without a suggestive cue) or a control condition (video watching). Mirror-gazing induced dissociation and decreased agency, especially among high trait dissociators, but the control condition was not sufficiently differentiated, as it also increased absorption, a construct which is considered a part of the domain of dissociative experiences. In Study 2, N = 199 undergraduates underwent the same manipulations with an additional improved control condition (article reading) and performed a task assessing agency implicitly. Mirror-gazing impaired explicit agency only among those high in self-reported trait dissociation, whereas it impaired implicit agency generally, perhaps bypassing self-report bias. Reading proved to be a better control condition for dissociation induction. The findings provide pioneering evidence of the causal relationship between dissociation and impairments of the sense of agency. Clinical implications are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bregman-Hai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: