PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 21, 2026Economic Geology2 citationsOpen Access

Episodic Ore Redistribution in Carlin-Type Gold Deposits in Southeastern Yunnan Province, SW China

View Full Paper
YMYu MiaoYZYe ZhouWLWen-Chang Li

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand the formation processes and fluid sources of Carlin-type gold deposits in southeastern Yunnan.
  • Analyzed multiple ore deposits, including Bieli and Bielidong.
  • Measured chemical compositions and isotopic values of sulfide minerals.
  • Identified different stages of pyrite formation and fluid characteristics.
  • Found distinct chemical compositions and δ34S values across different pyrite types.
  • Identified shared fluid sources likely linked to Precambrian metamorphic rocks.
  • Noted significant tectonic influences on fluid mobilization during deposit formation.

Abstract

Abstract The central-southern Youjiang basin in southeastern Yunnan hosts numerous Carlin-type gold deposits, such as the pyroclastic-hosted Bieli and the siliciclastic-hosted Bielidong deposits. In both deposits, gold occurs as lattice-bound Au+ in sulfide minerals of different paragenetic stages: sedimentary framboidal pyrite (PyS), diagenetic dissolution-reprecipitation porous pyrite (PyDR), hydrothermal early ore pyrite (Py1), main ore pyrite/arsenopyrite (Py2/Apy2), and late ore pyrite (Py3). The textures show there were multiple pulses of fluid flow related to the formation of the deposits. Sedimentary and diagenetic pyrite has negligible Au (1 ppm) and As (0.5 wt %) contents and extremely negative δ34S (−49.7 to −21.4‰) values, which differ markedly from early ore Py1 (Au = 0.05–4.20 ppm; As = 0.32–4.16 wt %; δ34S = −3.54 to 10.5‰), main ore sulfide minerals (Py2 and Apy2; mean Au = 9.28 and 39.2 ppm, mean As = 3.16 and 44.6 wt %, mean δ34S = 4.68 and 12.1‰), and late-stage Py3 (Au = 2.27–27.4 ppm; As = 7.80–9.49 wt %; δ34S = 8.62–13.5‰). The main ore sulfide minerals display positive δ34S values (4.68–12.1‰) and pronounced mass-independent sulfur isotope signatures (Δ33S = –2.80 to +8.16‰). The chemical composition and the δ34S and Δ33S values of ore sulfides indicate that the fluids were derived from a sedimentary source, most probably the Precambrian metamorphic rocks beneath the Phanerozoic basin. Both deposits formed by the same process, and the fluids came from the same source. Differences between the deposits are largely related to the local host rocks. The mobilization of the fluids seems to be the far-field effect of tectonic processes at the margins of the South China block.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69994cdf873532290d021b06https://doi.org/10.5382/econgeo.5209
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The source of gold in the Yata Carlin-type deposit, southwest China: constraints from pyrite chemistry and sulfur isotope2026
  2. 2Ore-forming processes of orogenic gold deposits in the northwest Fengtai Basin, South Qinling Orogen, central China: Constraints from pyrite texture and geochemistry2026
  3. 3Mineralization of the Sawayaerdun gold deposit, South Tianshan, Northwest China: Insights from texture and geochemistry of multistage pyrite and arsenopyrite2026
  4. 4Deciphering ore-forming fluid evolution processes of the Yuerya gold deposit, eastern Hebei, China: Insights from pyrite texture, trace element and sulfur isotope compositions2024 · 6 citations
  5. 5Ore-forming process of the Xiaoyuzan gold deposit in the Western Tianshan, Northwest China: Constraints from mineralogy and S isotopes of sulfides2024