Investigates maximal non-treed rings and their structural features, suggesting new relationships in ring theory.
Let <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi mathvariant="script">ℋ</m:mi> </m:math> {H} denote the class of all commutative rings with identity whose nilradical is a divided prime ideal. In this paper, we introduce and study the concept of maximal non-treed subrings , extending the concept from integral domains to the broader class <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi mathvariant="script">ℋ</m:mi> </m:math> {H} . Given a ring extension <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>R</m:mi> <m:mo>⊆</m:mo> <m:mi>T</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> {R⊆ T} , we say that R is a maximal non-treed subring of T if R is not a treed ring, but every proper subring of T properly containing R is a treed ring. We provide several characterizations of such rings and investigate their structural properties. In particular, we show that if <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>R</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="script">ℋ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> {R} and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>Nil</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>R</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>Z</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>R</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {Nil(R)=Z(R)} , then R is a maximal non-treed ring if and only if <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>R</m:mi> <m:mi>red</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> {Rred} is a maximal non-treed subring of its total quotient ring. We further explore connections with φ-QQR rings and ring extensions via amalgamated algebras. Several examples are provided to illustrate and support the developed theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: