This retrospective study examines how material deprivation affects clinical outcomes in cirrhosis patients, suggesting significant health inequalities persist.
Abstract Background Material deprivation (MD) is a key social determinant that may influence outcomes in cirrhosis, although its effect remains underdefined. Aims To assess the impact of MD on clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis in a universal healthcare setting. Methods We retrospectively studied patients with cirrhosis residing in Genoa, first attending our Unit during 2016-2022, classified MD from residential address by prespecified criteria, and dichotomized MD into low and high via cluster analysis; we assessed modality of cirrhosis diagnosis, disease stage, follow-up adherence, hepatic decompensation requiring hospitalization, and overall survival. Results We studied 368 patients (68.5% male, median age 63 years), most with compensated disease (57.9%). Patients with low-MD were slightly older (64 years vs. 62 years; p<0.0001), more frequently diagnosed through screening (58.6% vs. 14.4%; p<0.001), and less likely to be lost to follow-up (8.3% vs. 15.5%; p<0.0001) compared to those with high-MD. The incidence of hepatic decompensation episodes requiring hospitalization was higher (incidence rate ratio: 1.95, CI 1.29–2.99) and overall survival was shorter (66.2 months, CI 59.6–72.7 vs. 93.7 months, CI 83.5–103.5) in patients with high-MD. Conclusion MD significantly impacts clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with worse prognosis, despite universal coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pasta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: