PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Hydrology and earth system sciences6 citationsOpen Access

Uncertainty sources in a large ensemble of hydrological projections: Regional Climate Models and Internal Variability matter

GÉGuillaume ÉvinBHBenoit HingrayGTGuillaume Thirel

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the uncertainties in large ensembles of hydrological projections for future river flows in France.
  • Utilized the Explore2 dataset of river flow projections for 1735 catchments in Metropolitan France.
  • Employed the QUALYPSO method to analyze uncertainty sources in the ensemble.
  • Focused on projections by considering different climate scenarios and modeling chains.
  • Found strong agreement on decreases in low flows for a high-emission scenario in southern France.
  • Identified emission scenario uncertainty as the dominant factor for low flows across France.
  • Ascertained that regional climate models introduce significant uncertainty, especially in rainfall-dominated areas.

Abstract

Abstract. Multi-scenario, multi-model ensembles of hydrological projections are widely used to describe possible futures of regional hydrology and inform adaptation strategies. The Explore2 dataset is such an ensemble of river flow projections in Metropolitan France. It provides future simulations for 1735 catchments with modeling chains composed of different hydrological models forced by 36 regional climate projections based on bias-adjusted EUROCORDEX simulations. This study assesses the uncertainties of this ensemble with QUALYPSO, a method specifically designed to deal with incomplete ensembles and to disentangle and quantify all uncertainty sources, including that due to internal variability. Focusing on results obtained at the end of the century, this study shows a strong agreement between modeling chains towards decreases in low flows in a large southern part of France for a high-emission scenario, and very uncertain changes for the annual mean and high flows. Emission scenario uncertainty is the dominant source of uncertainty for low flows over the whole of France, and for mean annual flows in southeastern France. The contribution of the global and regional climate models is important for mean and high flows, especially in rainfall-dominated areas. Regional climate models contribute considerable uncertainty to low flows, much more than global models. The contribution of hydrological model uncertainty is large for low flows, moderate for mean annual flows, and small for high flows. For all climate and hydrological indicators, internal variability is often large and cannot be overlooked. It is often of the same order and sometimes larger than the uncertainty on the climate change response.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Évin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d27482488d673cd2e83https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1023-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A 50‐year high‐resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with the Safran system2009 · 802 citations
  2. 2Reconstructing High Resolution ESM Data Through a Novel Fast Super Resolution Convolutional Neural Network (FSRCNN)2022 · 68 citations
  3. 3Uncertainty component estimates in transient climate projections2019 · 54 citations
  4. 4Partitioning model uncertainty in multi-model ensemble river flow projections2023 · 9 citations
  5. 5How Do Modeling Decisions Affect the Spread Among Hydrologic Climate Change Projections? Exploring a Large Ensemble of Simulations Across a Diversity of Hydroclimates2019 · 163 citations