PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Journal of Burn Care & Research0 citations

The ENGAGE Protocol: ENzymatic debridement with NexoBrid® Followed by Grafting After Graded early Excision - A Retrospective Cohort Study

View Full Paper
GLGiuseppe A G LombardoUniversità degli Studi di Enna KoreMMMarco MollicaMartin UniversitySPSerafina PepeOspedale Cannizzaro

Key Points

  • Evaluate the clinical outcomes of the ENGAGE protocol in burn patients treated with NexoBrid®.
  • Conducted a before and after observational study
  • Compared outcomes between standard NexoBrid® management and the ENGAGE protocol
  • Endpoints included autologous grafting rate, length of hospital stay, mortality, and number of surgical procedures
  • ENGAGE group had a shorter mean hospital stay (24 days) compared to standard management (32 days)
  • Grafting rates remained similar between groups (60.7% ENGAGE vs 59.3% standard)
  • Mortality rates were comparable (9.8% ENGAGE vs 7.4% standard)
  • ENGAGE group had a higher number of surgical procedures per patient (4.36 vs 2.74)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Enzymatic debridement with NexoBrid® has become a cornerstone of modern burn care due to its selective tissue-sparing properties. However, the optimal timing and strategy for surgical intervention following enzymatic treatment remain debated. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the ENGAGE protocol (ENzymatic debridement with NexoBrid®, followed by Grafting After Graded early Excision), a structured algorithm integrating enzymatic debridement with scheduled wound reassessment and selective early excision. This before and after observational study included adult burn patients treated with NexoBrid® between January 2020 and October 2025 (2020–2022 received standard NexoBrid® management; 2023–2025 received the ENGAGE protocol, featuring day-7 reassessment and selective excision). Endpoints included autologous grafting rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), mortality, and number of surgical procedures. Eighty-eight patients were analyzed (27 standard NexoBrid® management, 61 ENGAGE). Baseline characteristics and burn etiologies were comparable. The ENGAGE group showed a significantly shorter LOS (mean±SD: 24±13.8 vs 32±19.2 days, median: 23 vs 27 days, p=0.03) with no increase in grafting rate (60.7% vs 59.3%, p=0.54) or mortality (9.8% vs 7.4%, p0.5). The number of surgical procedures per patient was higher in the ENGAGE group (4.36±3.82 vs 2.74±3.82, p=0.029), reflecting planned early reassessment and targeted intervention rather than increased morbidity. The ENGAGE protocol reduces hospital stay without compromising grafting or survival outcomes. By incorporating early, biologically guided excision after enzymatic debridement, it offers a structured and effective refinement of modern burn wound management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lombardo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d3c482488d673cd2f8chttps://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irag030
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nexobrid Use in the Elderly2025 · 3 citations
  2. 2A novel rapid and selective enzymatic debridement agent for burn wound management: A multi-center RCT2013 · 271 citations
  3. 3Enzymatic debridement for circumferential deep burns: the role of surgical escharotomy2022 · 20 citations
  4. 4The effectiveness of tumescent anesthesia in managing pain for enzymatic debridement of burns. A case-control study2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Implementing Nexobrid for Burn Debridement in a Major Italian Burn Center: A Retrospective Review of Patient Outcomes2023 · 6 citations