Quantitative analysis reveals potential energy cost savings in mixed-electrified truck fleets, suggesting transitions to greener transport.
Global greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced to meet the targets of the Paris Climate Accords. This study quantifies the potential energy cost savings of a holistic disposition approach for mixed-electrified heavy-duty truck fleets. Electrifying heavy-duty trucks reduces energy costs compared to traditional diesel-powered baselines. On-site energy generation further decreases electrification expenses. Bidirectional vehicle-to-grid participation also contributes to lowering energy costs. A mixed-integer linear programming optimization algorithm has been developed to incorporate these three approaches into the fleet’s disposition decisions. Real-world data have been utilized, including commercial order datasets, diesel prices, on-site-generated electrical energy prices, and vehicle-to-grid prices. Cost savings start at an average of 17% for small fleets with limited electrification and unfavorable price scenarios. However, they can reach net revenue generation for large fleets with high electrification and favorable price scenarios. A daily surplus of fleet energy costs can be achieved, with vehicle-to-grid revenues surpassing the costs of energy consumed. Ensuring battery electric heavy-duty trucks are available during high-revenue periods and operating during low-revenue times can lower overall fleet energy costs for commercial operators and improve power grid stability. By turning energy costs into net surpluses, this approach provides a financial incentive that could accelerate the transition to greenhouse-gas-neutral transport.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winkler et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: