Numerical investigation reveals effects of thermal and concentration relaxation in Williamson nanofluid, highlighting implications for heat and mass transport design.
This article presents a unified numerical investigation of dual-phase thermal and concentration relaxation in magneto-viscoelastic Williamson nanofluid flow over a permeable, thermally radiating stretching sheet using the Cattaneo–Christov (C–C) flux framework. The governing magnetohydrodynamic boundary-layer equations, including Joule heating, viscous dissipation and thermal radiation, are reduced via similarity transformations to a coupled nonlinear ODE system and solved with a high-accuracy spectral quasilinearization method (SQLM). Residuals below 10 −12 are achieved within six iterations on 40 Chebyshev nodes, ensuring grid-independent convergence. Parametric analysis shows that thermal relaxation ( β T = 0.1) suppresses wall heat flux by about 15.2% and thickens the thermal boundary layer by 4.48% (1% thickness criterion), confirming finite-speed heat propagation beyond classical Fourier theory. Concentration relaxation ( β C = 0.1) intensifies nanoparticle gradients, elevating the Sherwood number by nearly 4%. Suction ( S = +0.5) contracts both momentum and thermal layers, enhancing the Nusselt number by roughly 22%, whereas injection reverses this trend. Increasing the velocity ratio parameter from A = 0.1 to 0.4 reduces the skin friction by 24.4%. Radiation and thermophoresis further expand the thermal layer, while a higher Prandtl number confines heat within a thinner region. This study shows that the C–C flux model outperforms the traditional Fourier and Fick laws in representing finite-speed relaxation effects, providing valuable guidance for improving thermal and mass transport in engineering designs, including high-efficiency heat exchangers, electromagnetic coating lines, polymer extrusion dies, solar thermal collectors, and precision biomedical drug-delivery systems. These findings provide a comprehensive benchmark for designing advanced nanofluid-based technologies where simultaneous control of heat and mass transport under electromagnetic fields is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ENEYEW et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: