Open comparative study analyzes autologous fat cell transplantation methods for skin grafting in burn patients, suggesting better outcomes.
Objective. To analyze different methods for autologous transplantation of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue combined with skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft 1:6 in patients with extensive deep burns. Material and methods. Open comparative controlled prospective study was devoted to results of autologous skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft 1:6 and autologous cells of stromal-vascular fraction of adipose tissue. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on transplantation method: injection, aerosol, combined (aerosol+injection) and comparison group (standard skin grafting with split-thickness perforated transplants). There were 43 cases. Inclusion criteria: age 18—65 years, total area of skin burn 10—60% of body surface area, deep burn 10—45% of body surface area. Autologous skin grafting was performed on 10—15% of body surface area. Clinical, laboratory, cytological and histological methods were used to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Results. Combined (injection+aerosol) transplantation method was followed by significantly earlier engraftment (by 5 days, 9.9 ±0.7 days in the main group and 14.5±0.88 days in the control group, Student’s t test 3.518) and reduction of postoperative complications to 6% (in the control group 27%). Conclusion. Analysis of biotechnological methods for surgical treatment of patients with extensive deep burns showed the effectiveness of combined (aerosol+injection) transplantation and skin grafting with split-thickness skin graft. This approach reduced skin recovery time and incidence of postoperative complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alekseev et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: