Exploratory and validation analyses reveal increased cognitive failures and driving incidents linked to sleepiness in OSA patients, suggesting critical implications for driving safety.
Introduction Current guidelines emphasize assessing ‘excessive sleepiness’ and severity of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) when advising patients with OSA about driving. However, accidents can occur due to lack of concentration and poor reactions. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) measures self-reported cognitive deficits in the completion of simple everyday tasks. We investigated the relationship between drivers’ cognitive capability and the severity of SDB, sleepiness and self-reported driving incidents. Methods 348 patients (n=150, exploratory; n= 198, validation) considered for a trial of CPAP and 173 controls (n=105, exploratory; n=68, validation) matched for age and driving experience completed questionnaires that included the CFQ and a driving questionnaire. Results Compared to controls, patients had a higher total CFQ score (37 +/- 18 v/s 28 +/- 12, p= <0.0001, 95% CI= −13.3 to −7.3) and more self-reported driving incidents (accidents and/or near misses in the last year) (38% v/s 10%; OR=2.6; 95% CI= 2.79 to 8.34; p= 0.0005). Sleepiness rather than severity of SDB, predicted a higher CFQ score in patients compared to controls, both in the exploratory and validation cohorts. Self-reported driving incidents were significantly more frequent in patients who reported a higher degree of sleepiness (ESS >10; 40% v/s ESS <10 20%, OR=2.6; 95% CI=1.5 to 4.5; p= 0.0005). CFQ score was also a predictor of driving incidents. Conclusions Sleepiness and cognitive dysfunction, rather than severity of SDB predicts driving incident risk. The CFQ may identify a different aspect of accident risk and therefore may be useful in assessing fitness to drive in patients with OSAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dwarakanath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: