PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026The Journal of Financial Research0 citations

Policy uncertainty and tail risk in energy futures: The role of maturity and storage capacity constraints

View Full Paper
ASAlexandre ScarcioffoloIDIsarin DurongkadejXEXiaoli Etienne

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand how economic policy uncertainty impacts downside risk in energy futures, focusing on different contract maturities.
  • Analyzed energy futures markets from 1994 to 2024.
  • Examined maturity-dependent spillovers between economic policy uncertainty and Value-at-Risk.
  • Considered storage capacity constraints' effects on market dynamics.
  • Crude oil Value-at-Risk shows increasing connectedness with maturity.
  • Natural gas Value-at-Risk demonstrates a flatter pattern across maturities.
  • Storage constraints intensify spillovers to longer-term contracts, particularly in the oil market.

Abstract

Abstract We examine how categorical economic policy uncertainty (EPU) is linked to extreme downside risk in U.S. energy futures markets across contract maturities. Using data from 1994 to 2024, we document maturity‐dependent spillovers between EPU indices and Value‐at‐Risk (VaR) for crude oil and natural gas. Crude oil VaR exhibits increasing connectedness with maturity, while natural gas shows a flatter pattern. The composition of policy‐driven spillovers also varies across maturities and time. Storage capacity constraints, which may hinder carry arbitrage, intensify spillovers to longer‐term contracts, especially in the oil market. This highlights the role of physical market friction in policy risk transmission.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scarcioffolo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9d7a482488d673cd365chttps://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.70048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper