PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 22, 2026Clinical Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract PS1-13-04: Fairness-constrained logistic regression achieves superior performance and racial equity in breast cancer survival prediction

View Full Paper
JZJ. ZeinehRDR. DeAngelEGE. Grullon

Key Result

Fairness-constrained logistic regression improved overall AUC from 0.634 to 0.641 and AA-specific AUC from 0.610 to 0.632, reducing racial disparity by 41 points.

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess whether fairness-constrained logistic regression enhances predictive accuracy and reduces racial bias in breast cancer survival models.
  • Compared standard logistic regression with fairness-constrained logistic regression.
  • Used TCGA data with 1,000 patients (18.6% African American).
  • Focused on 5-year breast cancer survival prediction as the primary outcome.
  • Employed 10-fold stratified cross-validation for model evaluation.
  • Applied paired t-tests with bootstrap confidence intervals for statistical analysis.
  • Fairness-constrained model improved overall AUC from 0.634 to 0.641 (p=0.018).
  • AA-specific AUC increased from 0.610 to 0.632 (p=0.027).
  • Racial disparity metric improved significantly, shifting from +0.029 to -0.012 favoring AA patients.
  • Non-AA performance remained stable at 0.639, ensuring that equity gains did not compromise overall care.

Structured PICO

Does fairness-constrained logistic regression improve overall and African American-specific AUC in breast cancer survival prediction compared to standard logistic regression?

P
Population
1,000 breast cancer patients from TCGA data (18.6% African American, 70.8% survival rate)
I
Intervention
Fairness-constrained logistic regression for 5-year breast cancer survival prediction
C
Comparator
Standard logistic regression
O
Outcome
Overall AUC and African American (AA)-specific AUC

Incorporating fairness constraints into logistic regression models for breast cancer survival prediction improves both overall accuracy and racial equity.

Abstract

Abstract Machine learning models for clinical prediction often exhibit racial bias, resulting in inferior predictive accuracy and potentially poorer outcomes for African American (AA) breast cancer patients compared to non-AA patients. Such bias can result in delayed diagnosis, inappropriate treatment recommendations, and reduced access to clinical trials, thereby compounding existing survival disparities. Standard optimization approaches prioritize overall performance, risking the amplification of these inequities. We hypothesized that fairness-constrained hyperparameter optimization could enhance overall predictive accuracy while improving equity in AA-specific breast cancer survival prediction. We conducted a controlled study comparing standard logistic regression with a fairness-constrained version for 5-year breast cancer survival prediction using TCGA data (N=1,000, 18.6% AA patients, 70.8% survival rate). The standard model optimized overall predictive accuracy, while the fairness-constrained model also aimed to reduce racial disparities in predictions. Both approaches used identical 10-fold stratified cross-validation, enabling direct comparison. Primary endpoints were overall AUC and AA-specific AUC. The secondary endpoint was AUC difference between non-AA and AA patients as a disparity metric. Statistical analysis used paired t-tests with bootstrap confidence intervals (n=1,000 resamples) and effect size calculation via Cohen's d. Fairness-constrained logistic regression significantly improved clinical performance and racial equity compared to standard optimization. Overall AUC increased from 0.634 (95% CI: 0.582-0.664) in the control group to 0.641 (95% CI: 0.592-0.669) with fairness constraints, yielding a +0.007 AUC improvement (95% CI: +0.002 to +0.013, p=0.018, Cohen's d=0.917). AA-specific performance demonstrated even greater enhancement, with AUC increasing from 0.610 (95% CI: 0.518-0.687) to 0.632 (95% CI: 0.528-0.713), representing a +0.021 AUC improvement (95% CI: +0.003 to +0.040, p=0.027, Cohen's d=0.832). Most importantly, racial disparity was reduced, with AUC difference between non-AA and AA patients improving from +0.029 (indicating disparity favoring non-AA patients) to -0.012 (slight advantage for AA patients), representing a 41-point equity improvement. Non-AA performance was maintained at 0.639 AUC (95% CI: 0.596-0.678) with no significant change (p=0.276), demonstrating that equity gains can be achieved without compromising care for the majority population. Incorporating fairness-constrained hyperparameter optimization into predictive models can simultaneously improve overall accuracy and reduce racial disparities in breast cancer survival prediction. These findings, based on analyses only recently completed, provide new and timely evidence that equitable machine learning is both feasible and clinically advantageous. By demonstrating that fairness constraints can improve African American-specific outcomes without compromising performance in the majority population, this work represents a potential paradigm shift toward more equitable, precision-guided oncology care. Citation Format: J. Zeineh, R. DeAngel, E. Grullon, T. J. Lawton, K. J. Bloom. Fairness-constrained logistic regression achieves superior performance and racial equity in breast cancer survival prediction abstract. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-13-04.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zeineh et al. (2026) studied this question. Fairness-constrained logistic regression improved overall AUC from 0.634 to 0.641 and AA-specific AUC from 0.610 to 0.632, reducing racial disparity by 41 points.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699a9dae482488d673cd3c00https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps1-13-04
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper