Controlled diagnostics reveal likelihood redistribution in w_0CDM models, suggesting stability in early-universe parameters.
We perform controlled diagnostics of w_0CDM support conditioning using Planck 2018 FULL CMB likelihoods combined with DESI DR2 BAO measurements. Three inference branches are compared using identical datasets, likelihoods, and numerical infrastructure: (i) a neutral control run with broad prior support in w_0, (ii) a non-phantom restricted-support run enforcing w_0 > -1, and (iii) a phantom restricted-support diagnostic run enforcing w_0 < -1. The component-wise likelihood decomposition reveals a structured early-late split: the non-phantom branch improves the lowest-redshift BAO component (LRG1, z ≈ 0.14) by Δχ² ≈ +1.3 while incurring a modest penalty in high-ℓ CMB (Δχ² ≈ -0.6), whereas the phantom branch exhibits the opposite pattern. These component-level effects largely cancel in the total goodness-of-fit (|Δχ²_total| < 0.2), indicating redistribution along the existing (w_0, H_0) degeneracy rather than decisive model preference. Early-universe parameters remain stable across all branches (shifts < 1σ). We interpret the results as a Stage Zero diagnostic establishing numerical admissibility and internal likelihood structure under support conditioning, serving as a baseline for incorporating genuinely late-time probes in future work. All analyses use Cobaya with CLASS in a four-chain MPI configuration. Complete MCMC chains, configuration files, and reproduction notebooks are publicly archived on Zenodo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erik Tobias Hummel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: