Moral enhancement increases freedom

Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu have argued that biomedical moral enhancement is a moral imperative. Others have argued that biomedical moral enhancement poses an unacceptable cost to freedom. I respond to freedom objections to biomedical moral enhancement by John Harris, Jonathan Pugh, Christoph Bublitz and Robert Sparrow both on their own terms and in terms of perfectionist freedom. At the very least, I seek to prove that biomedical moral enhancement is no more harmful to freedom than other forms of moral enhancement. At most, I seek to prove that moral enhancement increases freedom.