Analysis reveals runtime security threats to cockpit domain controllers, indicating the need for a robust assessment framework.
A cockpit domain controller (CDC) has multiple roles, includ-ing instrument cluster panel, infotainment system, and heads-up display. Owing to its advantages, such as reduced development cost and vehicle weight and improved updatability, it has been gaining much attention. In general, CDC is supposed to host multiple virtual machines (VMs) ac-cording to their roles using virtualization technologies, such as hypervi-sors. However, there has been little discussion on the security risks posed by the modifications in the electronic control unit (ECU) architecture us-ing hypervisors. For example, multiple ECUs that were previously con-nected via a physical network could be connected via a virtual network controlled by hypervisors. By exploiting hypercall vulnerabilities, an at-tacker could compromise the virtual network and spread threats among VMs. In this paper, we analyze the security threats to the CDC architec-ture from the perspective of the system lifecycle and show that existing security mechanisms in the infotainment system are inadequate to deal with threats, especially during runtime. To address these challenges, we propose a multi-layered runtime assessment framework based on the root of trust and evaluate its effectiveness against runtime security threats. In development, car manufacturers and suppliers can apply this framework to CDCs to improve security resistance against runtime threats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirano et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: