Experimental investigation reveals permeability changes in impure rock salt under triaxial stress, indicating its potential for energy storage.
Impure rock salt is increasingly used as a host medium for underground hydrogen and compressed air energy storage in China; however, its permeability evolution under stress remains insufficiently constrained. This study presents a systematic experimental and modeling investigation of the permeability behavior of impure rock salt from the Pingdingshan (Henan) and Yunying (Hubei) salt mines. Nineteen cylindrical specimens were subjected to full-process triaxial permeability testing, including initial measurements, hydrostatic damage recovery, and staged deviatoric loading. A hydrostatic recovery stage (15 h at 40 MPa) was applied to reduce coring- and machining-induced micro-damage, resulting in a permeability reduction in one to three orders of magnitude. After recovery, the initial permeability decreases nonlinearly with increasing effective stress and converges to approximately 10−21 m2 at stress levels corresponding to in situ burial depths. During deviatoric loading, permeability exhibits a two-stage response: a rapid increase associated with early damage and microcrack initiation, followed by saturation once the dilatant volumetric strain exceeds approximately 1–2%. Impurity content influences both the magnitude and evolution of permeability by modifying the initial pore structure and damage development; however, the response is non-monotonic and region-dependent due to differences in dominant impurity mineralogy. Based on the experimental results, a semi-theoretical permeability model incorporating effective stress, dilatant strain, and impurity content was developed. The model reproduces the observed permeability evolution under different confining pressures with good agreement, providing a practical framework for evaluating the hydraulic integrity of impure rock salt in underground energy storage applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: