Systematic review shows selective COX-2 inhibitors improve outcomes in COVID-19 patients, indicating better efficacy and safety than NSAIDs.
The global epidemic of novel coronaviruses remains severe, and COX-2 selective inhibitors have attracted attention due to their promising clinical potential. Pertinent articles published up to 1 April 2025 were systematically searched and retrieved, including randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. To assess the efficacy of COX-2 selective inhibitors versus other NSAIDs, we analysed five aspects, including death, mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, oxygen uptake, and composite adverse effects. The results showed that COX-2 selective inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of death, with third-highest SUCRA ranking. Regarding the risk of mechanical ventilation, COX-2 inhibitors were associated with a reduced risk and ranked first according to SUCRA compared with other interventions. COX-2 inhibitors were also effective in reducing the risk of ICU admission and endotracheal intubation, again ranking first by SUCRA. In addition, COX-2 inhibitors demonstrated therapeutic potential in reducing the risk of composite adverse effects compared with other NSAIDs. Although this study shows that COX-2 inhibitors have good promise for the treatment of COVID-19, there is still a lack of high-quality RCTs to support the conclusions, and there is still room for improvement. (PROSPERO. CRD CRD42023445987) Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: