PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Left Axillary Artery as an Alternative Inflow Source in Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Safety, Feasibility, and Mid-Term Outcomes

View Full Paper
JSJian SongPeking UniversityTDTong DingPeking UniversityRLRui LiPeking University

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the safety and outcomes of the left axillary artery as an inflow source in MICS-CABG.
  • Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing MICS-CABG
  • Comparison between inflow sources: ascending aorta and left axillary artery
  • Propensity score matching for analysis of matched pairs
  • Assessment of intraoperative graft haemodynamics and early graft patency using angiography
  • Both groups showed similar intraoperative hemodynamic performance.
  • The graft occlusion rate in the AXA group was 1.32%, comparable to 3.16% in the AOR group.
  • Overall survival was 93.2% for AXA and 100% for AOR, with no significant difference.
  • MACCE-free rates were similar at 91.9% for AXA and 92.1% for AOR, indicating comparable mid-term outcomes.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and mid-term outcomes of using the left axillary artery (AXA) as an alternative inflow source for the proximal anastomosis of the saphenous vein graft (SVG) in MICS-CABG, focusing on intraoperative graft haemodynamics, early patency, and clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent MICS-CABG between April 2020 and August 2025 at a single center. Patients were divided into two groups based on the inflow source: the ascending aorta (n = 292) or the left axillary artery (n = 90). After propensity score matching, 80 matched pairs were analyzed. Intraoperative graft haemodynamics were assessed. Early graft patency was evaluated using coronary angiography or CT angiography. Mid-term outcomes, including overall survival and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), were compared between groups. Results: Both groups demonstrated comparable intraoperative hemodynamic performance. The AXA group demonstrated an early graft occlusion rate comparable to that of the AOR group (1.32% vs. 3.16%, RR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.08–2.11, and p = 0.45). Overall survival (93.2% vs. 100%, p = 0.06) and the MACCE-free metric (91.9% vs. 92.1%, p = 0.83) showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusions: The left axillary artery is a safe and feasible alternative inflow source in MICS-CABG. This approach provides acceptable intraoperative flow dynamics, early patency, and mid-term outcomes to conventional ascending aortic inflow.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Song et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699ba08472792ae9fd8703cfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13020101
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The left axillary artery is a reasonable option as the inflow site for saphenous vein graft in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Anaortic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Saphenous Vein: 20-Year Clinical Results2026
  3. 3Comparative Analysis of In-Situ Left Internal Mammary Artery and Saphenous Vein Composite Grafts for Left Anterior Descending Artery Revascularization: A Propensity-Matched Study2025
  4. 4Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts: Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2025
  5. 5RIMA-SVG versus Ao-SVG in coronary artery bypass grafting: protocol for a prospective, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority and single-centre trial2025