In vitro study shows solubility differences among sealers in two solvents, suggesting chemical composition impacts performance.
Objective: This in vitro study compared the solubility of three root canal sealers, AH Plus (epoxy resin-based), MTA Fillapex (MTA-based), and Cerafill RCS (bioceramic), in two solvents: Xylene and Endosolv. Materials and Methods: Sixty standardized cylindrical specimens were prepared using the three sealers of interest. The specimens were divided into six groups (n = 10) and immersed in either Xylene or Endosolv for 10 minutes. Solubility was assessed by calculating the percentage weight loss before and after immersion. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results: All sealers exhibited statistically significant solubility in both solvents (p < 0.001). AH Plus showed the highest solubility in Endosolv (72.63 ± 7.96%), while Cerafill RCS exhibited the lowest solubility in Xylene (6.99 ± 0.95%). Endosolv was significantly more effective than Xylene in dissolving all three sealers. Conclusion: The chemical composition of the sealer and the type of solvent have a significant impact on solubility. Endosolv demonstrated superior dissolving ability compared to Xylene, especially for resin-based sealers like AH Plus. Cerafill RCS exhibited the highest resistance to both solvents, underscoring the challenge of retreatment involving bioceramic sealers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palekar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: