PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 23, 2026Journal of Hematology & Oncology3 citationsOpen Access

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for major T-cell lymphoma entities: an analysis of the EBMT-lymphoma working party

View Full Paper
ESEvgenii ShumilovUniversity Hospital MünsterMNMaud NgoyaSorbonne UniversitéPBPhilipp BerningMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Key Points

  • To analyze the role of histology, disease status, and donor choice in allogeneic stem cell transplantation for peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
  • Analyzed adult patients undergoing stem cell transplantation for peripheral T-cell lymphoma from 2010 to 2022.
  • Compared histology and disease status prior to transplantation using CT or PET imaging.
  • Evaluated the impact of prior therapies on transplantation outcomes.
  • 1958 patients underwent stem cell transplantation with varying prior therapy lines.
  • Three-year progression-free survival was 50.9% and overall survival was 56.8%.
  • Relapse incidence was 25.1%, with worse outcomes linked to age and incomplete response at transplantation.

Abstract

Abstract Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is an established treatment for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), particularly for patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) disease. We aimed to retrieve novel information on the role of histology, disease status prior to transplantation, and donor choice for patients with PTCL not otherwise specified (NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative ALCL. We compared imaging by computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET) for defining disease status prior to allo-SCT. Methods Eligible were adult patients with PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALK-negative ALCL undergoing allo-SCT between 2010 and 2022 and reported to EBMT. Results 1958 patients underwent allo-SCT. Of patients with known number of prior lines of therapies (n = 1310), 301 (23%), 431 (32.9%) and 578 (44.1%) patients received allo-SCT after one (1L), two (2L) or three or more therapy lines (3L +), respective. Three-year GvHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.8%, 50.9% and 56.8%, respectively. Three-year relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality were 25.1% and 24.1%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, histology other than AITL, no complete response (CR) at transplantation, having a haploidentical donor and higher age at allo-SCT resulted in significantly lower PFS and/or OS. Prior autologous SCT had no impact on the results of allo-SCT and major outcomes did not significantly change when the analyses were restricted to the patients with PET-based response at allo-SCT. Patients allografted in partial response (PR) or SD/PD still achieved long-term survival with a 3-year PFS/OS of 46%/53.7% and 39.6%/43.6%, respectively. Conclusion Allo-SCT is a valid treatment option in relapsed/refractory PTCL where targeted therapies still play a limited role. Patients with AITL survived significantly better than patients with PTCL NOS or ALK-negative ALCL following a significantly lower RI, also when comparing CR/complete metabolic response (CMR) and PR patients separately. Higher age and non-CR at allo-SCT are associated with worse outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shumilov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699ba09872792ae9fd8707b4https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-026-01783-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper