Comparison reveals geographic differences in ovarian morphology in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, suggesting diverse implications for treatment.
Background/Objectives: Geographical differences exist in the clinical presentation of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The degree to which ovarian morphology contributes to this variability is unknown. Methods: This study compared ovarian ultrasound features between women with PCOS residing in two geographical regions (India and the United States) using stored de-identified ultrasound scans from 331 women with PCOS. Sonographic markers of interest included follicle number per ovary (FNPO), follicle number per cross-section (FNPS), ovarian volume (OV), ovarian area (OA), stromal area (SA), and stromal-to-ovarian area ratio (S/A). Results: Most participants in both regions met the accepted criteria for polycystic ovarian morphology (India 87% vs. U.S. 83%). The U.S.-based group had a higher prevalence of follicle excess (41% in U.S. vs. 29% in India; p = 0.037), whereas the prevalence of ovarian enlargement was similar across groups (India 37% vs. U.S. 31%, p = 0.252). FNPS was higher in the U.S.-based group (p = 0.046), while the India-based group had higher OV (p = 0.010). SA and S/A did not differ between groups, albeit OA was slightly larger in women with PCOS from India (p = 0.022). Associations between ovarian morphology and menstrual cycle length (ρ = 0.16–0.25), hirsutism score (ρ = 0.19–0.23), and total testosterone (ρ = −0.33–0.42) were noted in both groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Some variation in ovarian morphology may exist across geographic regions. However, the degree of variability is unlikely to warrant regional definitions for polycystic ovarian morphology at this time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: