This conceprual paper proposes a governance-based framework for evaluating the long-horizon societal externalities of pretrial detention, with a specific focus on women and primary caregivers. While traditional policy assessments prioritize immidiate fiscal and procedural outcomes, this model integrates insights from stress neurobiologicy (Allostatic Load), identity formation, and prevention economics to identify latent macro-level costs., The framework identifies three underexplored mechanisms: Biologically Mediated Stress Adaptation: Analyzing how high-intensity custodial stress-modeled through the lens of Robert Sapolsky's neurobiological frameworks - shifts brain function toward survival-based responses, leading to long-term cognitive and labor-market deficits. Identity Destabilization: Explorıng the structural dislocation of self-organization systems of women, whose identity is often scaffolded by dense social and caregiving roles. Perceived Institutional Risk: Investigating how institutional unpredictability functions as an environmental signal influencing long-term reproductive decision-making and demographic bevavoir. By incorporating the "Scarring Effect" on employment - specificaly the lifetime earnings reduction identified by Dobbie and Yang (2021) - the paper argues that current governance evaluation models systematically underestimate the true costs of detention. The proposed model suggests that the Return of Investment (ROI) for alternative monitoring is significantly higher when long-term health, economic, and demographic externalities are integrated into the fiscal balance.
Zarina Kasimova (Sat,) studied this question.