PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Annals of Surgical Oncology0 citations

The Superficial (Anterior) Plane in Mastectomy: An Under-Measured Margin Variable with Implications for Local Recurrence

View Full Paper
ZSZacharoula Sidiropoulou

Key Points

  • To examine the significance of the superficial plane in mastectomy as a margin variable linked to local recurrence risk.
  • Identified tissue composition at the superficial plane in mastectomy specimens.
  • Proposed standardized documentation for retrospective and prospective studies.
  • Analyzed existing literature on recurrence mapping and margin involvement.
  • Local recurrences predominantly occur superficially in postmastectomy patients.
  • Higher local recurrence risk associated with involved or close margins.
  • Call for standardized pathology documentation to better understand superficial margin implications.

Abstract

The anterior (superficial) aspect of the mastectomy specimen is often treated as an anatomical boundary rather than a true resection margin. However, pathology sampling studies demonstrate that benign breast epithelium/residual breast tissue can be present at the superficial dissection plane when actively sought e.g., benign ducts identified in 53% of additional superficial margin specimens after skin-sparing mastectomy (Cao et al. in Ann Surg Oncol 15(5):1372–1377, 2008) and residual breast tissue detected in 76.2% of intensively sampled mastectomy specimens (Griepsma et al. in Ann Surg Oncol 21(4):1260–1266, 2014). In parallel, recurrence mapping data indicate that most postmastectomy local recurrences occur superficially 81.8% in skin/subcutaneous tissues (Kaidar-Person et al. in Breast Cancer Res Treat 183(2):263–273, 2020), and systematic evidence shows that involved/close margins are associated with higher local recurrence risk pooled hazard ratio (HR) 2.64; skin-sparing mastectomy HR 3.40 (Bundred et al. in Eur J Surg Oncol 46(12):2185–2194, 2020). Despite these converging observations, the literature has not tested whether local recurrence risk differs when the superficial plane consists of skin/fat only versus fibroglandular tissue present. We propose a pragmatic, low-burden addition to clinical and database toolboxes: standardized pathology documentation of superficial-plane tissue composition (present/absent; optionally focal versus multifocal). This would enable retrospective analyses and prospective multicenter studies to determine whether the superficial plane behaves as an anatomical boundary or a clinically meaningful resection margin.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zacharoula Sidiropoulou (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699ceda059e024144310b775https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19307-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Identifying Factors Predicting Margin Status After Mastectomy2024 · 5 citations
  2. 2The Superficial Margin of the Skin-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Carcinoma: Factors Predicting Involvement and Efficacy of Additional Margin Sampling2008 · 61 citations
  3. 3Do surgical margins matter after mastectomy? A systematic review2020 · 33 citations
  4. 4ASO Author Reflections: Can Adequate Surgical Margin Rates after Mastectomy Be Improved?2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Superficial margins in skin sparing and nipple sparing mastectomies for DCIS: A margin of potential concern2021 · 14 citations