PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Catalysis Letters2 citationsOpen Access

Surface Spin Effect in Chemisorption and Catalysis: Computational Robustness

View Full Paper
LCLuis A. CiprianoOCOliver ChristensenBGBenjamin Grimm

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess the spin effect in chemisorption and catalysis using density functional theory.
  • Evaluated eight exchange-correlation functionals: 3 GGA, 2 meta-GGA, and 3 hybrid functionals.
  • Performed density functional theory simulations on cobalt clusters and surfaces.
  • Calculated adsorption energies of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and oxygen on cobalt.
  • Non-spin-polarized states showed stronger binding than spin-polarized solutions.
  • Adsorption energy differences correlate with local average spin moment.
  • Trend of energy differences holds across all tested exchange-correlation functionals.

Abstract

In this work, we show that the spin effect in chemisorption and catalysis is independent of the chosen exchange-correlation functional. Density functional theory simulations were performed to calculate the adsorption energies of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and oxygen on a cobalt cluster and a cobalt surface. Eight commonly used exchange-correlation functionals were evaluated: three generalized gradient approximation (GGA) functionals (BEEF-vdW, PBE and RPBE), two meta-GGA functionals (RTPSS and r²SCAN), and three hybrid functionals (PBE0, HSE03, HSE06). All functionals were applied to the cluster model, while six were used for the surface. Across all levels of theory, non-spin-polarized ground states exhibit stronger binding than spin-polarized solutions. The adsorption energy difference scales with the local average spin moment, with smaller energy differences corresponding to lower spin moments, providing direct evidence that adsorption energies decrease as the spin moment decreases. The consistency of this trend across all tested functionals highlights the generality and robustness of the spin effect in chemisorption and its impact on catalysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cipriano et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699ceda059e024144310b7b7https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05334-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Correlating Metal Spin Electron with CO Adsorption in Single‐Atom Catalysts: A Theoretical Investigation2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2DFT Investigation of CO2 Adsorption on Cu4 and Sc4 Clusters: Effects of Functional Choice, Spin State, and Vibrational Stability2026
  3. 3Assessing Vibrational Frequencies of CO Adsorbed on Cerium Oxide Surfaces Using SCAN and r2SCAN Functionals2025
  4. 4Spin-polarized non-ferromagnetic surfaces for electrocatalysis: chemo-spintronics2025
  5. 5Using <scp>CO</scp> Adsorption on Cu Surfaces to Benchmark <scp>DFT</scp> Parameters for Catalytic Modeling2026