Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work develops a framework to explore consciousness through structural coherence and trajectory differentiation, suggesting new insights into agency.
This work develops a formal, scale-invariant framework distinguishing instantaneous structural coherence (Ω) from time-extended trajectory differentiation (M). Coherence is modeled as a geometric mean over four vertices—Awareness (A), Experience (E), Identity (I), and Agency (G)—with a dimensional necessity condition for omnidirectional agency (K ≥ d+1). Meaning (M) is defined as trajectory differentiation under coherence gating, establishing Ω–M orthogonality at the level of regime structure. The manuscript provides analytic derivations for stability and agency conditions and includes simulation studies illustrating regime distinctions. Supplementary Information contains mathematical details, implementation notes, and full code listings supporting reproducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kévin Monceaux (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: