What does this research mean for the field?

75% of respondents in Kenya perceive AI as beneficial but recognize the necessity for robust data protection measures to safeguard privacy rights. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.NOVEL_FINDING. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

The central aim is to investigate ethical concerns surrounding AI and data governance in Kenya.

February 24, 2026Open Access

AI Ethics and Data Governance in Kenyan Societies: A Mixed Methods Inquiry

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The central aim is to investigate ethical concerns surrounding AI and data governance in Kenya.
Mixed methods approach combining qualitative interviews and quantitative surveys
Data collection from policymakers, technologists, and citizens
Analysis of perceptions regarding AI benefits and data protection
75% of respondents view AI as beneficial
Significant acknowledgment of the need for stringent data protection measures
Recommendations for improving data governance frameworks in Kenya

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Mixed methods inquiry explores data governance concerns and ethical implications of AI in Kenya, suggesting improvements.

Cite This Study

Mutemi et al. (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d4028de8e28729cf65356 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18735386

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

AI Ethics and Data Governance in Kenyan Societies: A Mixed Methods Inquiry

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

AI Ethics and Data Governance in Kenyan Societies: A Mixed Methods Inquiry

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider