PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026BMC Psychology2 citationsOpen Access

AI interactivity and human-technology engagement: psychological mechanisms underlying learners’ intention to use AI tools in language learning contexts

CLChenming LyuTSTang ShiSLShaopeng Li

Key Points

  • The study aims to understand how perceived AI interactivity affects learners' intention to use AI tools in language learning through psychological mechanisms.
  • Used a validated questionnaire to measure AI interactivity, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and behavioral intention.
  • Involved 740 Chinese university English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners.
  • Analyzed data using structural equation modeling to explore direct and indirect effects.
  • All four dimensions of AI interactivity significantly predicted behavioral intention.
  • Responsiveness had the strongest direct effect on intention.
  • Learning engagement showed the highest indirect influence via perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use.
  • The model demonstrated good fit with χ2/df = 2.216, RMSEA = 0.041, CFI = 0.964.

Abstract

The growing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education has transformed how learners interact with technology. Understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying this interaction is essential for optimizing human-technology engagement. Grounded in models of technology acceptance and human-AI interaction, this study examines how perceived AI interactivity influences learners’ behavioral intention to use AI tools, with perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) as mediators. A total of 740 Chinese university EFL learners completed a validated questionnaire measuring four dimensions of AI interactivity (responsiveness, personalization, learner control, and learning engagement) along with PU, PEOU, and behavioral intention. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with bootstrapping to test direct and indirect pathways. All four dimensions of AI interactivity significantly predicted behavioral intention both directly and indirectly through PU and PEOU. Responsiveness exerted the strongest direct effect, whereas, learning engagement showed the highest indirect influence via PU and PEOU. The final model demonstrated good fit (χ2/df = 2.216, RMSEA = 0.041, CFI = 0.964). The results reveal key psychological pathways through which human-AI interactivity shapes motivation and technology acceptance. AI interactivity plays a central role in shaping human-technology engagement. Immediate feedback and interactive design enhance motivation and perceived competence, thus offering practical implications for psychologically informed AI-based learning systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lyu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e90eff5123be5ed04e1ffhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-04229-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper