PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour2 citationsOpen Access

Pedestrian interaction with multiple highly automated vehicles: Effects of LED- and augmented reality-based external HMI communication in complex urban environments

View Full Paper
MWMarc WilbrinkMOMichael Oehl

Key Points

  • To investigate the effectiveness of augmented reality and LED-based human-machine interfaces on pedestrian interactions with highly automated vehicles.
  • Participants experienced different communication strategies from automated vehicles in a Virtual Reality setting.
  • Four distinct communication strategies were used: no eHMI, LED signals, AR signals, and a combination of LED and AR.
  • Measures included crossing initiation time, perceived safety, mental workload, understandability, and predictability, analyzed through ANOVAs.
  • LED and AR communication strategies significantly improved crossing initiation time and perceived safety compared to no eHMI.
  • AR signals outperformed LED signals in terms of communication effectiveness.
  • The combined LED and AR interface maintained the benefits without increasing mental workload.

Abstract

The introduction of highly automated vehicles (HAVs) promises safer, more efficient, and inclusive mobility, but also challenges pedestrian-vehicle communication. Without human drivers providing explicit cues, pedestrians rely on other signals for safe interactions. External human-machine interfaces (eHMIs) show potential, yet, their performance in complex scenarios remains insufficiently researched. In particular, research on the combined use of multimodal eHMIs – such as vehicle-mounted LEDs and wearable Augmented Reality (AR) - is scarce, despite their potential to offer both universal visibility and personalized, context-sensitive feedback. This study examined the impact of light-based and AR-based eHMIs – both individually and in combination - on pedestrian-HAV interaction in a Virtual Reality environment. Forty participants encountered HAVs approaching from both sides of a shared space. Vehicles employed one of four communication strategies: no eHMI, communication of HAV's intention via 360° LED light band, communication via AR, or novel multimodal setup combining LED and AR, as well as four different vehicle kinematics. Objective and subjective measures, including crossing initiation time, perceived safety, mental workload, understandability, and predictability, were collected and analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVAs with Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc tests. Communicating the HAV's intention via 360° LED or AR significantly improved crossing initiation time, perceived safety, and understandability, and reduced mental workload compared to no eHMI. Additionally, communication of HAV's intention via AR outperformed the LED condition, while the combined LED+AR interface preserved these benefits without increasing mental workload. Although yielding patterns influenced participants' behavior, eHMI benefits remained stable regardless of the actual traffic scenario. These findings demonstrate AR's potential in enhancing eHMI effectiveness and highlight the added value of a multimodal design. LED + AR combinations may guide the development of inclusive, intuitive, and context-sensitive eHMIs , ultimately supporting confident pedestrian interaction in future automated urban environments. • Augmented reality eHMIs support safer, faster interactions with automated vehicles. • AR eHMIs outperform LED signals in complex pedestrian–vehicle situations. • Combining LED and AR improves communication without increasing mental workload. • Pedestrians feel safer and less mentally strained when AR cues are used. • Findings highlight the potential of AR for future human–vehicle interaction design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilbrink et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e90eff5123be5ed04e259https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2026.103560
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper