A scoping review outlines model heterogeneity and emphasizes standards for preclinical long-bone research.
Preclinical models for critical-sized defects and non-union remain highly heterogeneous, limiting reproducibility and translational relevance. Clear, species-appropriate definitions, improved reporting of defect and fixation parameters, and alignment of study duration with species-specific healing dynamics are essential to strengthen comparability. While model selection should remain driven by the research question, greater standardisation and the development of biologically faithful non-union models are needed to improve the clinical predictive value of preclinical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: