PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education1 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of listening activities in arabic language teaching textbooks used in Turkey in light of the CEFR criteria

ZAZeynep Arkan

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the quality of listening activities in Arabic language teaching textbooks against CEFR criteria.
  • Qualitative document analysis of the 'Miftâh’ul-Arabiyye' Arabic teaching set
  • Evaluation of A1 and A2 level listening activities
  • Comparison with CEFR standards
  • Identified 118 listening activities in the A1 level book and 46 in the A2 level book
  • A1 book demonstrated high frequency in Overall Oral Comprehension and Understanding Conversations
  • A2 book excelled in Overall Oral Comprehension and Understanding Audiovisual Media
  • Both books aligned with CEFR standards in unit themes but lacked in pre-listening activities and multimedia use

Abstract

Textbooks and tools for teaching foreign languages are constantly changing. In teaching Arabic as a foreign language, new materials and interactive training are being created. This study examines an Arabic teaching set called "Miftâh’ul-Arabiyye," which has been used in many schools and language courses recently. This study focuses on listening activities, which are often overlooked compared to reading, speaking, and writing skills in language teaching. It examines these activities at the A1 and A2 levels in the nine-book Arabic set. The evaluation was based on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) standards for A1 and A2 levels. The CEFR, updated in 2020, is a method that defines language skill levels and is used worldwide. This study used a qualitative method to analyze documents and describe the findings. The analysis revealed 118 listening activities in A1 level book and 46 activities in A2 level book. A1 book showed highest frequency in Overall Oral Comprehension (f = 119) and Understanding Conversation Between Other People (f = 48), while A2 book demonstrated strengths in Overall Oral Comprehension (f = 70) and Understanding Audio (or Signed) Media and Recordings (f = 46). Both books demonstrated compatibility with CEFR standards in unit themes, recordings, and dialogues but showed deficiencies in pre-listening activities and multimedia integration. The study recommends balancing the distribution of activities, increasing listening to exercises, strengthening visual support, and integrating multimedia content to ensure full compliance with the CEFR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zeynep Arkan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e90eff5123be5ed04e290https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-025-00366-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mastery of Listening and Reading Vocabulary Levels in Relation to CEFR: Insights into Student Admissions and English as a Medium of Instruction2024 · 13 citations
  2. 2Revising second year university BA program: a didactic strategy integrating German writing and grammar courses2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Competencia sociolingüística en alemán como lengua extranjera: lengua, migración y conciencia lingüística2023 · 1 citations
  4. 4Yabancılara Türkçe Ders Kitaplarındaki Dinleme Etkinliklerinin Avrupa Ortak Başvuru Metnine Uygunluğu Üzerine Bir Çalışma2016 · 6 citations
  5. 5Interculturalizing ELT: Culture-based classes to enhance language skills and intercultural communicative competence dimensions2025 · 7 citations