Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigation of vascular adaptations and metabolism in glioblastoma using a chick embryo model indicates complex interactions between conditions.
Purpose To assess hypoxia-associated host-tumour vascular adaptations and glycolytic metabolism in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) glioblastoma model. Procedures U251 GBM cells were conditioned under normoxia (21% O₂) or hypoxia (1% O₂) for 72 h before implantation onto the CAM on embryonic day 7 (E7). Imaging was performed on E13 using MRI (control-CAM n = 8, normoxic-tumour n = 7, hypoxic-tumour n = 6) and brightfield microscopy (control-CAM n = 7, normoxic-tumour n = 8, hypoxic-tumour n = 7). Tumours were harvested on E14 for histology and gene expression analyses. In a separate cohort of 25 GBM-CAM tumours grown under normoxic conditioning, the correlation of glucose metabolism was assessed using [ 18 F]FDG-PET on E12 followed by lactate MRS on E13 (n = 8). Results Normoxia- and hypoxia-conditioned tumour-bearing CAMs exhibited vascular remodelling and significant upregulation of VEGFA and ADM compared to cultured cells. αSMA staining confirmed vessel infiltration in normoxia-conditioned tumours. CAIX staining revealed a hypoxic core in these tumours while hypoxia-conditioned tumours displayed heterogeneous staining. In both conditions, GLUT1 staining colocalised with CAIX staining, indicating hypoxia-associated glycolysis. GLUT1, PDK1 and LDHA expression was elevated in CAM tumours relative to tumour cells in vitro. In the metabolic imaging cohort, most tumours exhibited [ 18 F]FDG uptake and lactate signal. However, no statistically significant relationship was observed between the two methods. Conclusions The CAM model provides a versatile platform for investigating GBM vascularisation and metabolism. Hypoxic conditioning amplifies transcriptional and vascular changes to the CAM. Although both [ 18 F]FDG uptake and lactate were measurable, no significant correlation between the two was observed, potentially reflecting variability in tumour engraftment, vascular delivery of [ 18 F]FDG, and microenvironmental influences on lactate accumulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gash et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: