PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026PLoS neglected tropical diseases0 citationsOpen Access

Child exposure to animal feces and zoonotic pathogens in northwest Ecuador: A mixed-methods study

View Full Paper
VAViviana AlbanABApril M. BallardKJKelsey J. Jesser

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify zoonotic enteric pathogens in animal feces and understand how young children are exposed to these pathogens in Ecuador.
  • Conducted microbiological analysis of 120 animal fecal samples.
  • Performed semi-structured interviews with 35 mothers of children under two years.
  • Examined urban, intermediate, and rural communities across Ecuador.
  • High prevalence of zoonotic pathogens found, notably E. coli aEPEC (57%) and Salmonella sp. (36%).
  • Frequent co-infections observed in 33% of samples, with high pathogen concentrations exceeding infectious dose thresholds.
  • Chickens and dogs identified as key exposure sources due to their proximity to children and pathogen carriage.

Abstract

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), close cohabitation with animals and limited access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure increase the risk of zoonotic enteric pathogen transmission to young children. This mixed-methods study combined (A) microbiological analysis of 120 animal fecal samples, and (B) go-along, semi-structured interviews with 35 mothers of children under two years across urban (n = 10), intermediate (n = 15), and rural (n = 10) communities in Ecuador to investigate: (Q1) What zoonotic enteric pathogens are present in animal feces and at what concentrations? (Q2) How are children exposed to animals and their feces? and (Q3) Which animals may serve as key sources of child exposure? Microbiological analysis revealed high prevalence and concentrations of zoonotic pathogens, most commonly E. coli aEPEC (57%), Salmonella sp. (36%), and E. coli STEC (25%), with frequent co-infections (33%) and concentrations (4.97-9.29 log10 gc/g) often exceeding infectious dose thresholds. Qualitative findings showed risks from free-roaming animals, poor feces management, and frequent child–animal contact, often indirectly through caregivers and siblings. Triangulation identified chickens and dogs as the most likely potential exposure sources due to their behaviors, proximity to children, and pathogen carriage. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to limit animal roaming, improve animal feces management, and increase caregiver awareness, while underscoring how mixed-methods approaches can help identify context-specific exposure pathways that should be considered when designing interventions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alban et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e911bf5123be5ed04e6a8https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper