PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026International Journal of Damage Mechanics2 citations

Informing a damage model for fracture of concrete from lattice discrete particle model results

View Full Paper
JKJulien KhouryGCGianluca CusatisLPLaurent Perrier

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a damage model for concrete fractures using responses derived from lattice discrete particle modeling.
  • Utilized lattice discrete particle models for mesoscale description of concrete.
  • Obtained macroscopic stress and strain responses through coarse-graining.
  • Applied local and nonlocal damage models to fit observed data.
  • Computed damage evolution based on stress–strain responses.
  • Calibrated the nonlocal damage model parameters to match coarse-grained results.
  • The global response of the bending beam showed consistency with lattice discrete particle model results.
  • Energy dissipation profiles from the nonlocal damage model aligned with simulations.
  • Model parameters effectively captured damage evolution in concrete.

Abstract

Lattice modeling of quasi-brittle materials, such as concrete, is a discrete mesoscale description of a material, where constitutive relations are defined at a lower scale compared to the continuum-based approaches. Over the years, these lattice discrete models have become increasingly efficient, and they are expected to be useful for generating high-fidelity databases of complex material responses. Such databases can be exploited in two ways: either to inform data-driven approaches or to calibrate macroscale models. In this paper, we focus on the latter. Macroscopic stress and strain responses are obtained by coarse-graining lattice discrete particle model (LDPM) responses. Stresses and strains are coarse-grained independently from computations on bending beams. Local and nonlocal scalar damage models are used to fit these data. The evolution of damage is constructed from these stress–strain responses by computing the pairs composed of damage and the history variable that govern its growth. Model parameters in the nonlocal model, including the internal length, are then obtained by fitting the macroscale constitutive model to the coarse-grained results. The global response of the bending beam (load vs. displacement) and the energy dissipation profiles provided by the calibrated nonlocal damage model are found to be consistent with LDPM results.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khoury et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e91eaf5123be5ed04fb96https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895261421295
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper