Demonstrates the efficacy of Ru/ZnO nanoparticles for C–N bond formation under visible light, suggesting potential for pharmaceutical applications.
Although solar energy in pharmaceutical manufacturing poses challenges, its advantages in sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and innovation make it a promising area for further exploration. In this study, we report a rapid co-precipitation method for the synthesis of flower-shaped Ru-doped ZnO nanoparticles. The flower-like structures show an average particle size of ∼400 nm, accompanied by successful deposition of a substantial amount of Ru nanoparticles on their surfaces. The as-prepared Ru/ZnO nanoparticle photocatalyst was applied in a visible-light-driven photocatalytic protocol for the formation of carbon–nitrogen (C–N) bonds via the cross-coupling of aryl/heteroaryl carboxylic acids with N-heterocycles. This system is of particular interest to the pharmaceutical industry due to its potential utility in the synthesis of bioactive compounds. The flower-shaped Ru/ZnO nanoparticles were comprehensively characterized by using various analytical techniques, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), Raman spectroscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis, UV–visible spectroscopy, and inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis. The results confirm the successful synthesis of flower-shaped Ru/ZnO nanoparticles with a ruthenium loading of 3.12 wt %. The photocatalyst demonstrated excellent performance, achieving a conversion rate of 86% and a selectivity of 90% for the targeted cross-coupling reaction, and exhibited excellent photostability and recyclability under the reaction conditions. This efficient design, combined with a sustainable light source, highlights its potential for broader applications in industrial photocatalytic synthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bazyar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: