Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study examines complications of Plastibell circumcision in neonates, indicating ring size is crucial for safety.
Introduction: Plastibell circumcision is widely practiced in neonates because of its simplicity and low complication rate. Understanding factors influencing safety, especially ring size and operator experience, is essential for reducing preventable complications. Objective: The objective of the study is to determine the rate and predictors of complications following neonatal Plastibell circumcision in a tertiary military hospital. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all male neonates < 90 days was done, who underwent Plastibell circumcision between June 2024 and May 2025 at Prince Sultan Military Medical City. Variables included age, weight, ring size, surgeon level, diathermy use, and postoperative outcomes upon presentation to the hospital. Statistical analysis included chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 552 neonates, complications among patients presenting to the hospital occurred in 17 (3.1%), which were bleeding in 15 (2.7%), infection in one (0.2%), and ring migration in one (0.2%). Ring size 1.3 was the only independent predictor of complications (odds ratio (OR) 2.10; p = 0.048). Age, weight, surgeon level, and diathermy use were not significant predictors. Conclusion: Neonatal Plastibell circumcision is safe with a low complication rate. Ring-size selection remains the main modifiable factor, highlighting the importance of objective sizing protocols and enhanced surgical training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qayyum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: