PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2000Journal of Clinical Oncology1,270 citations

Randomized Phase III Study of Temozolomide Versus Dacarbazine in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Metastatic Malignant Melanoma

View Full Paper
MMMark R. MiddletonJGJean‐Jacques GrobNANeil K. Aaronson

Key Points

  • Compare the efficacy of oral temozolomide against standard dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma.
  • Conducted a randomized phase III clinical trial comparing oral temozolomide directly with intravenous dacarbazine.
  • Enrolled patients diagnosed with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma.
  • Temozolomide achieved therapeutic efficacy equal to that of standard dacarbazine.
  • Oral administration of temozolomide provided a viable alternative to intravenous dacarbazine regimens.

Abstract

Temozolomide demonstrates efficacy equal to that of DTIC and is an oral alternative for patients with advanced metastatic melanoma.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Middleton et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699ec393713733805dde645bhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.1.158
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper